Thursday, November 17, 2005

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Director: Mike Newell)

HARRY POTTER AND THE GOBLET OF FIRE has been nominated for Art Direction (Stuart Craig, Stephanie McMillan)















Newell has had a long career spanning back into the sixties, but it was 1992's Enchanted April that first got him noticed and Four Weddings and a Funeral that made him somewhat of an "it" director. Then came An Awfully Big Adventure and his best film to date Donnie Brasco. He did the fun Pushing Tin and his last was Mona Lisa Smile. He becomes the first British director to take over the Harry Potter franchise, began by Chris Columbus for the first two and taken over for the better by Alfonso Cuaron for The Prisoner of Azkaban. Steven Kloves (Wonder Boys) adapts J.K. Rowling's novel for the fourth time.

Potter fans know that this installment is the beginning of some dark territory. Coinciding with Potter's entry into adolescence, the boy is about to grow up exponentially over the next couple of years but still have awkward growing up to do. The first three Potters were connected over time by the characters and their growth and they were all important episodes in the overall story, but the next three (and assuredly the next and final) are all intimately connected. What happens here decides the direction of the series. It's the "swing" chapter. Not that anyone knew when they first starting reading this that it would be such a crucial book, because it seemed just like any other Potter with a different set of challenges, and Rowling was just tweaking the narrative a little bit...but she had much more in mind.

In this installment, Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) has stayed over at friend Ron Weasley's (Rupert Grint) house for most of the summer, and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) has joined them, for what is going to be an opportunity to watch the Quidditch World Cup between Ireland and Bulgaria. After the match, some hooded figures, "Death Eaters," storm the campgrounds outside the arena and start burning everything down, causing terror, and leaving grand villain Voldemort's mark in the sky. After that, it's another year of school at Hogwarts--except this time they will be playing host to the Tri-Wizard Tournament, where schools from France and Bulgaria will stay for the year to watch the exciting but dangerous series of tasks performed by representatives from each school. The way "champions" are chosen is by putting your name in the giant goblet of fire, and on one special day, it spits out the representatives. Hogwarts's man is Cedric Diggory (Robert Pattinson), but strangely enough, so is Potter's, who didn't try to enter. So, four people have to tackle dragons, merpeople, and a giant hedge maze for various tasks.

Of course, there's still the matter of school. Harry and crew have a new Defense of the Dark Arts teacher in Alastor "Madeye" Moody (Brendan Gleeson), who is teaching them about wicked spells that have never been as much as uttered before, and Harry's developed his first crush in Cho Chang (Katie Leung), and it looks like Hermione is having her first brush with love with Bulgarian Quidditch star and Tri-Wizard rep Victor Krum (Stanislav Ianevski), much to the chargrin of Ron, who harbors secret feelings for the long-time friend.

This is a long, long movie. They've cut a lot of inessential stuff out, but I think perhaps they could have cut a little more--although I admit much of what they could have cut (like a lot of the Yule Ball) is fairly important in the emotional arc of the later books, so it can be forgiven--if you know what's coming. But film fans coming just to see a good movie, who don't know where the series heads, might be turned off by some slow patches here and there. When it focuses on the Tri-Wizard Tournament and especially the consequences of the last task, it's an incredibly involving film at that point. Like I said, it's really the beginning of darker times, and thus, this movie plays like a first chapter of a bigger story.

Michael Gambon returns as Dumbledore (and I can't wait to see him in the next chapters, where he becomes a more imposing figure), Maggie Smith as McGonagall, Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid, Miranda Richardson as nosy, wrong-facts journalist Rita Skeeter (who by the way, is representative of what I feel the media is), Warwick Davis as Flitwick, Jason Isaacs as Lucius Malfoy, Alan Rickman as Severus Snape, Gary Oldman as Sirius Black, and Ralph Fiennes takes the shape of Voldemort.

Mike Newell continues the series where Cuaron left off, by infusing the film with a little more imagination than Columbus attempted with the first two. The young actors are getting better as well. I expect this to be the first of three $200-300 million grossers this winter, which combined with a lot of other sure hits will stop the nonsense about the slump.

7 Comments:

At 11/17/2005 02:51:00 PM, Blogger Jonathan said...

I'm assuming one of the other two is "King Kong." So, what would be the third? Rent?

 
At 11/17/2005 03:34:00 PM, Blogger Kennelworthy said...

Awesome! I see this tomorrow and I'm actually pretty pumped. Each film has gotten better, in my opinion, and I hear that Goblet is the favorite book of the series for many Potter fans.

As for the other blockbuster...I think he's intending Chronicles of Narnia to fill that slot, and I would agree.

I do think Rent and The Producers could be big, but the next three months will belong to Potter, Kong, and Aslan.

 
At 11/17/2005 03:36:00 PM, Blogger Chris said...

THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA will make 200-300 million. Bank on it. It's PASSION OF THE CHRIST meets LORD OF THE RINGS as far as interest goes.

As far as the other surrounding hits, WALK THE LINE will make over 100, RENT will be a pretty big hit, and there's two family comedies, the kind that people normally flock to in droves--YOURS, MINE, AND OURS, and CHEAPER BY THE DOZEN 2. Beyond that, THE FAMILY STONE will probably be a sizeable hit as well. I'm not sure about THE PRODUCERS or MEMOIRS OF A GEISHA but I think they'll be hits.

 
At 11/17/2005 04:55:00 PM, Blogger Amy said...

Chris,

Thanks for the insight on this film. I have been patiently waiting for it and will be heading into the theater tomorrow morning to watch. The first three films have set up the story and as a reader of the Potter books, this is where the real action begins. I really enjoyed book 4, 5 & 6. The pace quickens, the plot thickens and there is even a love story (well that develops in 6). I am excited to see Newell's take on the franchise. Of course I could sit through five hours of the film if they did not cut anything.

 
At 11/17/2005 08:09:00 PM, Blogger Jonathan said...

I completely forgot about "The Chronicles of Narnia." That actually doesn't look very interesting to me, but it's getting some good early word, so hopefully it will be good. I know I read the books as a kid, but with the exception of them opening the closet door and going into this world, I don't remember anything else about the stories.

 
At 11/18/2005 08:19:00 AM, Blogger Jade said...

Oooh, thanks for the review. I'm waiting to read the books until after I've seen this movie. I don't want to be disappointed (as I often am) when books are put into film.

I've been waiting for this review. Glad to hear it sounds like such a hit. I'll be going tomorrow night. Can't wait!

 
At 11/18/2005 08:58:00 PM, Blogger Kennelworthy said...

Okay, just saw Goblet of Fire today...and it flat out kicked ass for me! I loved it. I haven't read a single book, but the movies alone have hooked me on the characters. Rowling and Warner Brothers both deserve credit for allowing the films (in tone and look and mood) as well as the stories to grow up with the characters.

Didn't feel long to me, though I was certainly aware of the time length...but I wouldn't know which parts to leave out to make it shorter. Dark, very dark in spots, and brooding. Four for four as far as each film improving on the last. Great stuff.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home